Relieving the stigma of interaction on public transport.

  • Chatty Commuters

    Relieving the stigma of interaction on public transport.

  • Campaigning at Victoria

    We go to one of London's busiest hotspots to test the levels of interaction between commuters.

  • Say Hi! Campaign

    Acknowledge your driver when you jump on or off a bus to relieve the stigma of interaction on public transport.

  • Taxis, Uber, ViaVan

    How has classical and new forms of cab service changed the potential for interaction between staff and customers in this mode of transport?

  • Challenge the Consultations

    Does TfL's consultation programme really give the public agency over their public transport services or are their consultations merely a facade of democracy?

Polls 2: final poll

We had a great response as you can tell from the few I attached, there were a bit too many, it had a great interaction level and was engaged with very well by the community. if you flick through our posts, comment and get involved in the discussions.
The suggestion I put forward as a campaign to make the TfL stigma of engaging and interacting with people less awkward was something extremely positively responded too! 80% said yes to this being a thing and it should maybe be implemented on the larger, spacier trains first I was suggested. It was a great idea and I think one we should push. gives people on their journeys, short or long to interact, socialize and all with the safety of the train in case anything dangerous does happen there will be people on board to assist. Having it run through social hours, on particular days with someone at hand to help. However it happens, I think it should be implemented. enjoy the responses guys!




Share:

VIDEO: Spin around Battersea Bus Garage

We fulfil our rationale by acting out the simple courtesies that can make a refreshing change to our experience of the daily commute. Acknowledge your bus driver when you jump on or off a bus!


Also see a shorter version @sayhicampaign.
Share:

Polls and Results! P1

Some screenshots below of the results of those who responded and engaged with our general social survey!


Share:

POSTER: Challenge the Consultation




Share:

Bus vs. Car - who wins?

Aboard route 321. A trip between New Cross Gate Station and New Cross Sainsbury's. (Yes, I couldn't be bothered to walk it and the 321 was conveniently there for me so allow it.)

©London Bus Breh.
The driver started departing the bus stop, exiting the bus lane onto the right lane towards New Cross Sainsbury's. However, he did not notice a car coming alongside the rear of the bus as he performed the lane change. This forced the car onto the opposite lane, swerving around the bus and assertively rejoining the correct side of the road in between the front of the bus and the queue of traffic at the lights. 

They then turned green, but the car driver was no longer in as much of a haste as their overtake suggested - they started accelerating, at a stubborn crawling pace. I looked at the rearview mirror located at the centre of the bus just behind the front windscreen to see the driver wave his hand in aggravation before the car driver gave up his antics to continue down New Cross Road as the road opened up onto a third lane for which the 321 takes to access Sainsbury's.

Unlike giving way, this opposing driving etiquette is nevertheless one of the many ways in which drivers interact through their vehicles. This engages with the micro-sociological spatiality of everyday life that Erving Goffman talks about (cited in Ben Highmore's 'Intrdouction: Questioning Everyday Life' in 'The Everyday Reader', p.11). For other unusual driving interactions, see Hamza's post.
Share:

Response to VIDEO

Just seen the video of the visit to the bus garage, looks great! Good work you guys that went, really think its important that we got the chance to have a real, in depth talk with those that work on transport to full understand their perspective and show to them that there are people that want to challenge the awkward atmosphere of London Transport.
Share:

VIDEO: Say Hi! Campaign

We feel that there is an unspoken but widely recognised awkwardness regarding interaction with public transport workers. For example, the customary habit of not acknowledging a bus driver when you jump on or off a bus or confronting Underground workers for delays that more often than not is out of their controlThe Say Hi! Campaign has visually addressed this on our socials - this short film highlights the political implications of this negative-leaning perception of the bus driver or negative-leaning relationship between commuters and passengers. 

Therefore, by collecting public opinions of bus drivers and integrating them with driver interviews, this short film offers a scope for improved interactions between commuters and public transport staff and vice versa.


Thank you to Abellio London and Battersea Bus Garage for giving us access to their facilities and their staff. Seeing drivers for who the individuals they are, like the rest of us, outside of the cab is a refreshing experience that I would like to think this film shares with its audiences and that our project values in its rationale to reduce the stigma of interaction on public transport.
Share:

INTERVENTION: Challenge the Consultation

Challenge the Consultation is slightly removed from our other two interventions to the extent that it does not immediately concern the direct interaction of physical communication between commuters and public transport staff. Say Hi! Campaign and Hospitality in Transit were more micro-level in their focus of everyday life in the domain of public transport. Challenge the Consultation concerns itself with the political implications of TfL's consultation programme on a macro-level analysis of everyday life.

While TfL's consultation programme invites public response to inform considerations of service changes around our transport network, more often than not public response is not reflected in the outcome of decisions made to progress with TfL's proposed changes. I strongly believe this is microcosmic of the interactional breakdown between politicians and constituents, whereby politicians only look at policies from a macro-level of understanding - e.g. "cost-efficiency" has been the justificatory rhetoric for the withdrawal of many longstanding London bus routes - rather than engage with more micro-level demographic concerns with the policy - e.g. interchanging, having to adjust custom journey patterns because your customary service is no longer available or no longer running along the same route it had done to the convenience of its communities for many years.

Hence, I wanted to challenge the consultation by offering more community-friendly and journey-efficient alternatives to those proposed and implemented against public response invited but ultimately ignored by TfL's consultation programme. We created a poster to stick over the information sheets at bus stops for routes that have changed against public response such as route 23. This route used to run to The City from Westbourne Park. However, route 10 between King's Cross and Hammersmith was withdrawn and the 23, seemingly unrelated other than both routes paralleled on Oxford Street, became its replacement. The 23 now runs to Hammersmith via Park Lane, Knightsbridge and Kensington, even though at Paddington the 27 already does this quicker in the other direction. This effectively removed yet another link from west London into central and has rendered the 23 almost useless between Paddington and Hammersmith, with the small exception that Edgware Road is now directly linked to the Royal Albert Hall. Compare the amount of passengers doing that journey to the amount that used to take the 23 to the West End and right into The City - St. Paul's, Bank, Liverpool Street - and we see the macro-level cost-efficiency objectives in action against the macro-level conveniences expressed by commuters who use the services daily.



Unfortunately, it does not look like I will have the time to post up our posters at the relevant bus stops. However, to compensate I have published them on Flickr. We received generally positive feedback. Alex Peak, for example, replied that 'there’s a systemic problem with these consultations. It’s either too many different voices or one person making all the decisions and getting it wrong.' This is what motivated me to include Challenge the Consultation in the project.

I also shared the idea with the bus blogosphere on our featured blog London Connected. Responses were similarly interested in the idea and critical of the consultations:







Share:

INTERVENTION: Say Hi! Campaign

The Say Hi! Campaign has been integral to the rationale of our project: to relieve the stigma of interaction on public transport. It has taken numerous forms: on Instagram, we have provided anecdotes and quotes from the everyday commute; on SoundCloud, we have collected voice notes discussing public perception of bus drivers. Now, we have physically implemented our intervention with exclusive access to bus drivers from Battersea Bus Garage to get an insight into the everyday life of the bus driver. We discussed the importance of interaction between drivers and passengers, and the important of the bus on a wider consideration of public transport. More importantly for our rationale, we got to know drivers for who they are, like the rest of us, outside of the cab thus outside of the negative perception that surrounds their job. 

Say Hi! Campaign short film coming soon.
Most importantly, while there is a negative-leaning perception of bus drivers, our visit reinforced the fact that outside the spatial confinements of the driver's cab from which perceptions of the bus driver are visualised, they are just one of us. Working people, providing a service. In one of our interviews, bus driver and administrator Ezeta Coleman argues that bus drivers are not acknowledged. This is realised when lost property customers fail to provide descriptions of the bus driver who was driving the bus on which the customer's item was lost. Additionally, commuter attitudes towards bus drivers such as "I'm paying your wages" because they are paying for travel, despite the fact that bus drivers represent the same socio-economic background as most of their commuters, reinforces the political implications of the often negative anecdotes of interactions between commuters and driving staff.

We also explore the spatial politics between bus drivers and other road users. For example, what I have observed is the scenario whereby a bus is trying to pull out of a bus stop onto the main lane but other road users are not giving way; another bus behind at the bus stop might then pull out to form a momentary blockade to let the bus in front out. A good metaphor for this is that bus drivers are trying to join an onrush which is the everyday life struggle of any working citizen towards progress, but the onrush is inconsiderate of their fellow proletarian, to give it Marxist undertones. Sometimes, though, one person might stick out their hand to stop the onrush to let their fellow proletarian through. Spatial politics of the road, therefore, reinforce suggestions of this negative-leaning perception of bus drivers that Anton, along with many others like ourselves, feel is inherent within the public transport network.


The Say Hi! Campaign does not intend to instil some sort of victim mentality concerning bus drivers and depict the public as the enemy. Indeed, as you shall see in the short film I am currently editing, bus drivers too can make interaction on public transport less appealing between themselves and their passengers. Dennis and Marlon highlight that bus drivers have a duty to keep their passengers safe and well-informed. When a passenger comes on and asks a driver a question, but the driver is unwilling to talk, dismisses them or confronts them, that is a sign of the stigma of interaction on public transport that creates the divisions our rationale aims to tackle.

We gained an exclusive insight to the everyday life of bus drivers from visiting Battersea Bus Garage and I can't wait to complete this intervention with this short film that aims to create an interactive aura concerning commuters and bus drivers. Thank you to Abellio London for helping us with our project.
Share:

Bus Garage




This week me, Hamza, Hanna and Isaiah took a trip down to Queenstown Road bus garage.

The reason for this was to engage and interact with the employees who are assigned to the Abellio bus garage.
It was an amazing experience and opportunity to discuss first hand with those who are integral in our day to day lives and travels, making sure everything runs as efficiently as possible.


Thank you to everyone at Abelio particularly Ezeta, Marlon and Dennis who were really accommodating.
Below are some of pictures taken from our intervention spent at the bus garage.








Share:

Upload Alertttt!

Hey guys,
after yesterdays polls and research, I've managed to get some people to explain how they feel about Tfl and aspect of everyday

One is an artist who focuses much of his work and writing on inspiration underground and is a fellow student at our university!
check it out by clicking here

Another is of an economics student who graduated and currently works for a think tank who improve our services in London
It's short and sweet as she did not have much time to provide but thankful for her contribution!!
check it out!

Enjoy your day, stay smiling at your fellow commuters, relieving stigma!!
Share:

Bus Stop Poster Idea - Response

The reason it fits in with the intervention is because on a political level, the outcomes of public consultations have gone against the public response it invites. This is politically loaded because it is a microcosmic display of the limited interaction between politicians and their constituents when it comes to negotiating policies that affect everyday life, especially problematic if we consider ourselves a participatory democracy.

The modification of route 23 has reduced the number of services from its sections in west London that link to The City to none. As a result of what TfL call "cost-efficiency" objectives, the average commuter has to make adjustments to their everyday commute. Our rationale is not necessarily focused on interaction between commuters, rather all types of interaction related to public transport, whether that be indeed between commuters, between commuters and public transport staff, or between the public and transport policy-makers. The latter is why we should Challenging the Consultation.
Share:

Instagram: @sayhicampaign

Undergoing a little poll/quiz and survey on the Instagram page!!!
If anyone has some time to pop over and engage, that would be amazing

@sayhicampaign
@sayhicampaign

also, you can see some short clips of our intervention of hospitality!!


Will be sharing results from posts tomorrow!
Until then, go and like our posts!!

Share:

Meet your new bus drivers!




Share:

BUS GARAGE INTERVENTION!

So this week me, Isiaih, Hamza and Mohammed had loads of fun popping down to Queenstown Road bus station.

We had the opportunity to engage and interact with those who work Abellio bus garage!
It was an insightful and great experience to discuss with those who are involved in our everyday commutes and ensuring everything runs smoothly.

Thank you to everyone at Abelio particularly Ezeta, Marlon and Dennis who were amaazing!!!
Below are some pictures from our intervention of spending the day at the bus garage!
Keep your eyes out for the production soon



Share:

Voice Notes

Hi Guys
I set up the Soundcloud for the voice notes.
I'll send you guys the email and password.
This is the link for it. I've uploaded two. One from someone from the public and another from my friend.
https://soundcloud.com/user-197117786.

Share:

Bus Stop Poster Idea

I feel like that Bus stop directions idea we had is dissimilar in nature to our rationale or the intervention. I think a better way to streamline it so it fits the rest of the project would be if we argued that faster and simpler travel for passengers would allow people to worry less about directions or if they are going to be late or not, thus freeing them up to be more sociable to fellow passengers and members of staff. As too many times, people can be too busy working out where they are going or if they'll will be able to get there in time to even consider conversing with anyone unless it is a must.
Share:

VIDEO: Hospitality in Transit

We offer an interactive hospitality service at St. John's Station to provide all commuters with that first-class privilege otherwise restricted to the few who can afford it. Our aim: to relieve the stigma of interaction on public transport. Politically loaded to challenge the spatial barriers to communication that have the implications of reaffirming class divisions on public transport.


Edited by Isaiah Egwuagu.
Narrated by Katy Davidson.
Share:

Free Tea at St. John's Station

I met up with Katy to complete one of our three interventions: Hospitality in Transit, a.k.a. Katy's Hospitality Service. It went much better than we expected!


One of the things that has set us back during this project is conforming to the procedural approach of asking for permissions. So we took it upon ourselves to set up a hospitality service at an isolated station with infrequent services where passengers could be either alone and/or waiting a while for their trains. Katy chose St. John's Station, which proved a brilliant choice as not only did commuters show appreciation for it - whether or not they had some tea or not - but the platform staff equally embraced it to the extent that they actually started offering commuters our service!

Katy and I used our skills from working in hospitality to entice commuters to our service. I also set up my camera on the bench pictured below to record some of the interaction for a short film documenting our intervention. I came back the week after the intervention to do some additional  scenic filming to complete the final edit.


Overall, Hospitality in Transit shows that a hospitality service at train stations can increase the scope for interaction towards relieving the unspoken awkwardness of interaction on public transport. From learning about the demands of being a platform guard to discovering a shared trait for on-the-cusp tardiness with another commuter, Hospitality in Transit turned one of the most isolated and quietest stations in London, to potentially the most interactive!

Perhaps with the cohesive capacity and extended planning, our catering intervention could be trialled at stations in north, south, east and west to see how the levels of interaction on public transport, or the opportunity for it, varies according to which side of London you are in. Us Chatty Commuters have learnt that Hospitality in Transit is best implemented at quiet stations, where the commute is less busy hence the potential for a more interactive commuting experience is achievable. All-in-all, satisfied with how this one went. Well done, Katy!
Share:

INTERVENTION: Hospitality in Transit!

We did our first intervention of the project! What began as the 'Bus Stop' intervention has evolved into what we're calling Hospitality in Transit.

What the aim was:
As explained in the previous post about the Bus Stop Intervention, what we wanted to do was produce an experience that would relieve the stigma around communication on transport and generate a positive atmosphere for everyone we came into contact with. We wanted to do this by providing a hospitality service that would have a positive impact on people's day and also act as a conversation starter between us and those around us. Considering our other interventions are bus focused, on this one we decided to shift to an alternative mode of transport so chose a train station. Additionally we wanted one that wasn't over crowded and one that didn't already have a shop so people would engage. After discussing the ones we knew of, we decided on St Johns station. This provided an alternative dimension as it is a very isolated station; only 2 platforms that's well away from the road.


What we actually did:
Wednesday, April 10th was the day we did the intervention. The logistics of providing a hospitality service took some consideration and after discussion, we decided to provide a hot drinks stand for anyone that was passing through. After gathering supplies in the morning, I met Isaiah and we made our way to the station where we set up. We put up some posters around the station to advertise what we were doing and used the posters I had made to draw attention as they had some shocking statistics of the realities of London Transport. Tea and coffee are things that a majority people enjoy and so I hoped it would be a product that most people would say yes to.


How it played out on the day:
Once we were all set up, we needed to begin engaging with those around us. Initially, it took a few minutes for us to figure out how to go about talking to people. Isaiah first went up and asking the conductor if he would like a hot drink, from there we asked passengers that were waiting for their train to arrive and then those getting off the train and leaving the station. As it got closer and closer to evening rush hour, the number of people that engaged with us picked up significantly and turned out to be hugely successful!

Of course the number of people taking tea was great, but it was the conversation that the small offering created that was the success of the day. Whether people accepted or declined to our offer there was always one question, "what's it for?". Our presence on this relatively small station was noticeable and therefore drew people in; they were curious of our intentions and wanted to find out more.
So we explained it to them. That were there with the intention of carrying out our aim - to relieve the stigma of interaction on public transport. We wanted to encourage communication of all types on the platform whether it was between the passengers with each other or the passengers and the station staff.  We had numerous interactions throughout the time we where there from 15 minute conversations where people wanted to know more about our University, degree or our modules to 1 minute interactions just to ask people how their day was going. But there were 2 that really stood out to me that I believe really enrapture the point of our intervention that day.

Firstly was with one of the platform conductors. This gentleman was named Nana and was one of two conductors running St Johns station. We started out by providing him with a beverage, asking about his day and explaining to him our intervention. He was discussing with us which stations he thought we'd have success at etc. However, after a while we really got an insight into what his job was like day to day. When we asked whether passengers interacted with him we got a varied response but a particularly interesting point was when Nana said that his interactions with passengers increased when it was dark; passengers tended to stand closer to him on whatever part of the platform he was on during the night. This was an aspect I hadn't thought of, probably something I maybe do subconsciously.  Here platform conductors are taking on another responsibility, whether they chose to or not, something we passengers take for granted. Although it was just a small thing Nana mentioned, I thought it was a really interesting point.
After some more small talk and Nana encouraging passengers to take a beverage on our behalf, he told us a story from just the week previously when he had been the only one working at the station. Nana spend most of his shift taking a women down from taking her own life by jumping in front of a train. He described how he noticed her down at the end of the platform, went down to confront her and talk to her in order to keep her engaged. Nana had to physically restrain the lady at one point, and managed to communicate with the train conductors office through a driver stationed at the platform to have the electricity to the whole station shut down. For one moment, the lady was able to escape Nana's watch and did manage to jump on the tracks from the platform but due to Nana's quick thinking and amazing conduct, she had no injuries and the police arrived soon after. We spoke to two conductors during our intervention and both had experienced, seen or knows of someone who has been involved in such a situation.  This is something that I don't think many people realise is a real part of the job of working on public transport; something which can have a serious impact on a persons life. Hospitality on transport allowed us to talk to Nana, hear his story and allow his to share it. This is some effort from us to allow staff to tell of what it's really like to work on transport and share the realities of the job to those who take the TFL staff for granted.




Other was a male and female, one of which was on crutches. This interactions was a lot shorter and they had just got off a train and where obviously intending to leave the station immediately. But with Nana's help, they agreed to take our offer of tea. When making the tea, I enquired to the lady how her journey and day had been, to which she replied 'not great'. However after just a few minutes of just talking, the five of us were laughing and smiling. Although it wasn't much, I truly hope and believe that small interaction helped to improve their day, putting a smile on their faces even if only for a few minutes.

All together, I think the intervention was real successful because it was simple. There was no pressure for the passengers or staff to engage but it was there if they wanted it, if it would contribute positively to their day. Our lengthy discussion hopefully improved his shift a bit, and showed to those around us that engaging in interaction with TFL staff is not a taboo but actually welcomed. Additionally, talking to passengers allowed us to open up the channels for communication between passengers and giving them tea would hopefully encourage them to pass the act of kindness forward so that they too contribute kindness to others they interacted with during the day. Thanks Isaiah for all your help in making the intervention a success and ensuring we had a great impact on the platform.






















Share:

'Free Tea'

I met up with Hamza last week Tuesday to do one of the three interventions.
It didn't go as smoothly as we expected as we were in Tottenham Court Road.

Me and Hamza had met up with our phones on the verge of dying and we had set up just outside of the station just next to the furniture shop. In that the station was so fast and busy we didn't get a lot of people taking tea or anything we had to offer. We had analysed that there was a Pret that most people were getting food and drinks from as they were rushing to the underground. Although there was an all round respect for what we were doing as we got the casual 'thank you's' and 'no thank you' it was nevertheless a pleasure.
In that I had previous experience in hospitality we thought the intervention would go smoothly. In addition, the TFL staff were very kind however did not want tea as it was blazing hot.


Things to do next time:
Not to go to such a busy station
Not offering tea on a hot day
And carrying a camera
Thank you
-
Share:

Thames Travel's Attempt


An interesting Chatty Bus idea shows how one company, Thames Travel, uses badges and extra staff to encourage social interaction among its passengers to combat loneliness.
Share:

If something is broken- we fix it?!

If a train or bus was broken, it would be easy to assess the damage and fix it. However, if a driver is becoming distant or an under performer, the reasons may not be so clear cut. For example, a colleague coming to work with a broken arm, they would have a plaster on, whereas with stress there could be no visible signs at all.However, stress is a major factor in the mental well-being of a driver. One article i found suggested that it should be the employers that ask themselves these questions:
  • How emotional are support services available for drivers?
  • How physical are there opportunities for exercise?
  • How community do long hours make social activities difficult?
  • Do friends and family do long periods away from home increase isolation, depression?
  • Do work practices increase stress and anxiety?
  • Do pay rates and pay structure increase fatigue?
  • Do company and individual values align?
Mental health charity "Time to Change" has found that when people are asked how they are, three-quarters of people will say ‘I’m fine’ even if they are struggling with a mental health problem. “We are encouraging everybody to ask twice,” says Jo Loughran, director of Time to Change. “Asking twice – ‘Are you sure you’re ok?’ – means people are much more likely to open up in conversation.”. Therefore, our campaign is fitting as we as commuters could do our bit and simply say hi or ask how they are! More importantly though, employers should open up more channels for drivers to open up about any mental health issues.
An increase in mental health issues among drivers is no surprise when many are subjected to abuse on a daily basis. Read these articles here to get a feel of what they have to deal with: 

The government do try and take action on abuse on public transport but this won't tackle depression or isolation. We should try our best to create a nice environment and atmosphere for the staff. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/anti-social-behaviour-on-public-transport-safety-measures



Tasha
Share:

Evolved Rationale

With our new statement line that we have on the blog and on our instagram accounts think it's time to evolve the wording of our rationale. The ideas are still the same, just think we need to solidify and condense what we want to achieve down into more appropriate language and shorter explanations.
This was our previous rationale:

To combat the atmosphere of isolation and loneliness that TFL employees face when working. They are almost invisible. Additionally there has been numerous instances of abuse that these people face. The campaign that we hope to implement and spread is an attempt to combat these isolating and hostile environments by simply encouraging people to engage with these individuals who are usually ignored. By doing this, we aim to improve the working conditions of those employed by  TFL though a campaign focused on social media, posters and small advertising clips.

Our intervention is politically loaded because public transport systems reveal structural inequalities through the spatial means of, e.g. the glass barrier separating drivers from their passengers - legitimised under the purposes of “security” (see Marx) – and social – e.g. the direct abuse drivers get for changes to a service made by those higher up (service controllers as a live transit example and policy-makers on a more operational macro-level). 

However I think we have now moved away from just the abuse of staff towards more general interaction, between passengers, staff and management. Each one of our interventions targets one of these to think we need to grow our rationale to keep up with this. 

We have been incorporating and focusing the project round the phrase 'Relieving the stigma of interaction on public transport' but now we have also been discussing the use of stigma and taboo within our project. As Isaiah's post mentions, are the words too strong? do they alter the meaning of our rationale, have we been mis-using them?? Instead we are discussing the use of awkwardness instead.  So the new rationale:



Relieving the awkwardness of interaction on public transport. Public transport is an intrinsic aspect of life for many Londoners, something they take part in almost daily. But the atmosphere of public transport can be one of loneliness, hostility and isolation. For those that use it, those that run it and those that manage it, interaction can be limited to almost nothing even though it can take up a large part of their day. The atmosphere created through the lack of interaction on public transport can be detrimental to the health of staff, to someone having trouble travelling through London or to the effectiveness of the service. The campaign we hope to implement is an effort to combat the awkwardness created by these hostile environments by simply encouraging people to engage with individuals they may have previously ignored. A campaign spread through social media, videos and two interventions. 
Transport is politically loaded because the transport system reveals structural inequalities throughout its arrangement. For example, spatial inequalities eg. the separation of staff and passengers through glass barriers reducing communication, often justified through 'security', and social inequalities were staff are abused, individuals often targeting them for choices of transport management. 


Of course, if anyone wants to add anything that I've missed just comment and I'll edit the post. 







Share:

Link between Bus Drivers and rates of depression


This article, from 2014, is interesting article and although its focus is not on the UK, I feel like there are many similarities in the shared experiences between the drivers here and the drivers in Pennsylvania, US.

BigThink Article
Share:

What is your opinion of bus drivers?

Another source to draw from for tomorrow's visit. Many interesting things to learn from this video, including the stereotype that all bus drivers are miserable, the negative-leaning perceptions of bus drivers and the perks of being a bus driver.

DoubleDeckerAnton: What is your Opinion of Bus Drivers?


Share:

Interview

Check out this article. We can draw from its focus and the questions asked for our interview:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bus-drivers-reveal-what-think-10516591

Image: Liverpool Echo. Link to article here.

Share:

Challenge the Consultation - Route 23



Isaiah my email isn't working but i threw this together using your message from a few days ago.


Share:

Response to Isaiah

Hello everyone,

For some reason it won’t let me comment on Isaiah’s post so here’s my response. Thank you for researching and pointing out the issue of the words we’ve used for the rationale. I agree that they are a little extreme and think we should go forward with the new wording that you have proposed!

Thank you

Tasha
Share:

"Stigma" vs. "taboo" - too strong?

Are the words "stigma" and "taboo" too strong for our intervention? See below various definitions which have left me conflicted as to whether they should form part of our rationale. In bold are phrases which give the word relevance to our project, in italics the reverse. This might seem pedantic or petty, but if we are to publish our rationale and upload stuff online with the rationale it is important to recognise the implications of the words we use.

Google Search - Oxford Dictionary
Stigma - a mark of disgrace associated with a particular circumstance, quality, or person.
Tabooa social or religious custom prohibiting or restricting a particular practice or forbidding association with a particular person, place, or thing.

Cambridge Dictionary
Stigma - a strong feeling of disapproval that most people in a society have about something, especially when this is unfair.
Taboo - an action or word that is avoided for religious or social reasons.

Collins English Dictionary
Stigma - If something has a stigma attached to it, people think it is something to be ashamed of.
Taboo - if there is a taboo on a subject or activity, it is a social custom to avoid doing that activity or talking about that subject, because people find them embarrassing or offensive.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Stigma - a mark of shame or discredit.
Taboobanned on grounds of morality or taste.

Vocabulary.com
Stigma - if something has a negative association attached to it ... the negative stereotype or reputation attached to something.
Taboo - something considered taboo is naughty, something society considers a no-no ... when we say that certain subjects are "taboo", meaning off-limits for discussion.

If you are not satisfied by any of this, I suggest an alternative: 

Chatty Commuters
Relieving the awkwardness surrounding interaction on public transport.
Share:

Climate Change - We Can Change

Campers at Marble Arch - unusual to see this multi-lane road traffic-free.
ULEZ has literally gone ultra.
It is odd to see a line of buses standing at Edgware Road Station outside Paddington Green Police Station, but it became apparent that something beyond the norm was causing the queues when I saw yet another Metroline-operated bus appear alongside the A40 - southbound buses curtailed to Edgware Road use the A40 to turn around at Little Venice back down towards the left turn onto Edgware Road northbound.

This was my initial observation - the queue got longer!
I saw a Metroline rep communicating with some drivers so thought he would be the guy to ask what was going on. The man read off, quite obliviously, the leaflet to inform me that there were demonstrations going on in central London that was diverting all traffic. I took a train to St. John's Station to do some additional filming for this project before catching bus back to New Cross to do some shopping.

Since nothing was going further than Edgware Road Station, I wondered where my 36 home would curtail or how it would divert to get to Queen's Park. The answer was all buses on the 36 were curtailed to Victoria. I also noticed a 172 curtailed to Elephant & Castle. I took a 36 - a slightly older type, albeit still hybrid which should satisfy the eco-friendly advocates causing such disruption - and at Victoria, asked a driver for a ticket in order to validate a free journey that the Metroline guy from earlier told me TfL were allowing - well, to the extent that train fares cost the same as bus fares, I assume, within Zone 1 - to accommodate journeys within central.



I almost let the disruptions and the adventurousness of this travel distract from the fact that I had to go shopping, so I got off at Marble Arch Station to understand the dynamics of the protest.

Extinction Rebellion protests at Marble Arch Station.
'Business as usual costs the Earth.'
'Climate Change We Can Change.'
Climate change protests are currently taking place in 80 cities from over 33 countries and, while I am generally indifferent to protests particularly in the Western world as I feel they are more publicity stunts than politically mobile - i.e. the political is the topic to justify publicity for the protesters, rather than the focus of the publicity -  as captioned in one of the photos above they have actually asserted the Ultra Low Emission Zone by camping on its roads!

However, when they start to disrupt the train network, the stringency to protester aims becomes dubious. I immediately questioned how sub-surface travel is significant for the climate change protest since our trains, as far as I know, are powered by electricity, compared to the many diesel-powered vehicles polluting our streets although hybrid and electric alternatives are on the rise. An article by CityLab then better informed my queries, describing poor ventilation as causing pollution on the London Underground. The S Stock trains on the Circle, District, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan Lines address this as our first air-conditioned trains.

Nevertheless, I digress from the argument I wanted to highlight - which is the problem with ecological and environmental debates. While they address issues that need to be addressed, everyone seems to get sidetracked by the short-term disruptions these protests cause instead of realising the long-term priority that these disruptions should have for the quality of the world we live in. If protesters can maintain their drive, maintain the mentality of the aims influencing their protest instead of getting lost in the means - i.e. the publicity, as protests too often do - and the public can realise the significance of the climate change protests beyond the disruptions they are currently causing, these protests may just work. They have reinforced the ULEZ, but they also require support from the public for more people to be consciously aware about the climate and more importantly the government to communicate with the protesters in order to progress from the piecemeal philosophy I often feel formulates policy.

It is difficult to change how we live, but the more collective thought goes into improving what and how we consume for improving the climate, I feel boosted becomes the potential for change for the better.
Share:

Chaos on the TFL?

Hi guys,

I'm sat down with this some tea looking at the newspaper and what's new. The current news is: Extinction Rebellion London, Activists
The group have been blocking roads and bridges this week in a bid to get coverage to tackle the climate change. Moreover, nearly 300 activists have been arrested and don't plan on stopping. The TFL bus alerts posting this on Twitter

'Central London / "Extinction Rebellion" - Buses in central London remain on diversion or stop short of their final destination due to on-going protests. London Underground are accepting bus passes in Zone 1. Check your route here: '

They even posted on their website Extinction Rebellion that they would 'nonviolently disrupt tube services to highlight the emergency of ecology collapse'

Will it get more chaotic?
Share:

Abuse on TFL


On my normal journey to meet my friends on the VERY hot central line towards Epping going to Leytonstone. I had stopped Tracy who was going from carriage to carriage checking to see if everyone had a valid payment method. As she took my Oyster to check if it was valid I took my advantage with asking some questions;

Me: Hey, I'd like to ask a few questions for a blog I'm doing for my University if you don't mind

T: Hi, of course not these little things make my job that much more fun

Me: Tell me a good and bad experience you've had whilst working here if you don't mind

T: Well, I've been working for TFL for over five years and you can only imagine what I've been through. The best moments are having people who stop and just say Hi. Honestly it makes me day because everyone else acts as if you're a stranger and just there to direct them to different lines, show them the routes, and more. The challenge and bad parts of this job is working on the weekends. As much as it's fun I've witnessed a lot of anti social behaviour.

Me: When you say anti social behaviour can you discuss what you mean maybe?

T: In terms of a series of people going out on the weekend getting drunk which is completely fine however, most of the direct contact comes from drunk people. They get loud, violent, and all sorts. Which is why certain laws have been put into where people can no longer drink alcohol or carry open containers of alcohol on public transport. That including buses, trams, tubes.

Me: How do you deal with that such behaviour or challenges?

T: With kindness. In terms of dealing with it can be difficult as I'm small I have been all my life so I pretty much try to get my other colleagues to help. It can be hard because everyone is different and you to deal with everyone differently. But the policies are quite straightforward.

Me: Thank you so much for answering my questions I'm cutting it short as the next stop is me but could I potentially take a picture of you or with you?

T: I'd love to however my kids would be so embarrassed if I did. So I'll have to decline.

In essence, the dealings of the everyday life on TFL is very different for different people. The abuse they face on a daily basis is very evident and is highlighted on weekends.
As far as being more cautious of TFL workers everyone should be!
Have a good day and Say Hi! to a driver.
Share:

Route C2 withdrawn against majority opposition

Route C2 is the latest to be withdrawn from service against public response to Transport for London's consultation proposing the service change.



When TfL released the consultation for this service change, which involves extended route 88 to Parliament Hill Fields and re-routing the service via otherwise unparalleled sections of the C2, this proposal was met with a 65.45% opposition in public response. Only 15.67% supported the proposal, with concerns ranging from simply withdrawing the C2 to the impact the extension of the 88 in place of the withdrawn route C2 would have on reliability. Further concerns directed at the consultations themselves stated that they merely seem to be 'tick-box' exercises whereby concerns are not listened to and I feel that, at the very least, concerns are for the most part not reflected in TfL's decisions to go ahead with these service changes. Otherwise, we would still have a C2.

A bit like buzzwords from learning outcomes at school, the consultation state the opportunity for respondents to express their concerns, whilst skirting around the effectiveness of public response in determining the outcome of the consultation.
Source: Proposed changes to bus routes 88 and C2 - Consultation Report (December 2018).

You can read more about the withdrawal of the C2 on London Connected, where it is additionally voiced by the author that, while many locals have adjusted to the service change, 'they probably wouldn't have had much choice' but to do so anyway.
Share:

Popular Posts

Featured Post

Intervention

Our group have had many discussions in the workshop throwing out ideas at both ends of the spectrum of the conservative and the ridiculous!...

Search This Blog

Translate